They think that by undermining the case against Southall ref Clark is going to work in the Court of Appeal? Really, thing is boys, the Clark judgement stands and a GMC review panel has no juridstiction over Justice Collins - it's a none runner, it's not allowed in - anyway he never appealed it, do you all seriously think Southall was struck off because of Mrs M's case alone?
Deluded all of you.
You think the "panel weren't qualified" shit is going to work? None of you said a word about that when it was Camille de sam Lazero, or Colin Patterson or interestingly in Clark did you ???
Let me put you all straight, Mrs M and Mr Clark are NOT one offs, ask your boy Davey what he tried to pursuade HM Coronor in Hampshire to do (I have the transcript of the phone call) Ask your boy what he accused the New Zealand mother of doing when a neighbours baby died.
I can't wait for this appeal because I have the evidence of repeated patterns, like a recording of Southall bursting into a parent's home in Stoke on Trent and shouting "you are emotionally abusing your children" in front of those children and being exceptionally abusive and threatening to the mother, lovely, how marvelous for those children, who remember the entire incident BTW. Not to mention an independent investigation into that incident upholding the complaint about your behaviour. Shall I You Tube it? Does everyone want to hear how "kind and compassionate" David Southall really is?
You see the reason that the Panel at the GMC struck you off David is because you were rendered naked, alll those different excuses for having the SC Files which varied according to who was asking you a question, the reason they didn't believe you or that lying social worker is because your lies were exposed at that hearing, you and Salem lied, PACA members provably lie, can't put the evidence up, it's in other agencies hands right now.
